Document review
Extracting and validating fields from registration documents, IDs and consent forms โ with confidence scores that route low-certainty cases to a human.
AI Automation Lab
Applied experiments in using AI to remove real administrative load โ document review, completeness checks, exception triage. Measured against a human baseline, not a demo.
Use cases
Extracting and validating fields from registration documents, IDs and consent forms โ with confidence scores that route low-certainty cases to a human.
Flagging registrations missing documents, signatures or guardian details before they become a compliance problem mid-season.
Surfacing the records that don't fit the pattern โ duplicate players, mismatched transfers, impossible dates โ instead of waiting for someone to notice.
Ranking the day's follow-up queue by deadline risk and financial exposure, so limited admin time hits the highest-value items first.
Summarising a player or club's full history into the three facts an administrator needs before making a call.
Turning pipeline metadata and lineage into first-draft technical documentation that an engineer edits rather than writes.
Experiments
Testing structured extraction against real (anonymised) club registration packs. Measuring field-level accuracy versus manual entry, and the human review rate needed to beat the current error baseline.
Can an administrator ask "which under-14s are missing a medical form?" and get a trustworthy answer over Unity Catalog? Focus is on refusal behaviour when the model shouldn't guess.
Generating candidate pipeline expectations from profiling a bronze table, then measuring how many survive review by an engineer who knows the domain.
Translating Power Query M-code into PySpark with a test harness that diffs output frames, so the translation is verified rather than trusted.